翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Bird stamp
・ Bird stone
・ Bird strike
・ Bird Studies Canada
・ Bird Studios
・ Bird stump vase
・ Bird Symbols
・ Bird Talk
・ Bird Technologies
・ Bird Town
・ Bird Township
・ Bird Township, Arkansas
・ Bird Township, Macoupin County, Illinois
・ Bird tracks
・ Bird trapping
Bird v Bicknell
・ Bird vision
・ Bird vocalization
・ Bird Walk
・ Bird Watcher's Digest
・ Bird Watching (album)
・ Bird Watching (magazine)
・ Bird Week
・ Bird Wing Imperial
・ Bird Without Wings
・ Bird Woman Falls
・ Bird York (album)
・ Bird's Custard
・ Bird's eye chili
・ Bird's eye figure


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Bird v Bicknell : ウィキペディア英語版
Bird v Bicknell

Bird v Bicknell () 2 NZLR 542 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding fraud merely being a factor (albeit an important factor) in determining whether an exclusion clause is valid or not. It is contrasted with M E Torbett Ltd v Keirlor Motels Ltd where is held that an exclusion clause is simply not valid where a party has committed fraud.
==Background==
Bird was in the business of selling franchises regarding a chemical process, which they told Bicknell was secret only to them, and that a patent application was pending. These claims were later discovered to be fraudulent, and Bicknell refused to make the final payment on his franchise. Bird pointed out the contract had a clause agreeing to no warranties were given about the patent.
Bird sued Bicknell.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Bird v Bicknell」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.